Name dropping, obscure academic and policy references, phony conservatism, intellectually dishonest argumentation -- Brooks has it all! And DBIAF aims to explicate.
Why? Because in your heart, you know he's wrong. And a fool.
Here's some of the things we'll feature:
- Hyperliterate references and citations
- Awful argumentation
- Intellectual dishonesty
- Phony conservatism
- Wrongheaded cultural perceptions
So come on! Share your thoughts! Tell us what you think is awful, silly, pompous or generally atrocious about David Brooks's writings in the New York Times. Highlight a particular column, or paint with a broad brush. Just join the conversation.
We want to hear from you!
Rich Pliskin
No comments:
Post a Comment